How does LL-37 work, according to the published research?
The two structural studies recorded here describe LL-37 bound to model membranes and micelles: an amphipathic helix that lies along the membrane surface rather than spanning it, which their authors read as a detergent-like, carpet-type interaction rather than the formation of a pore. One of them also reports the peptide is cytotoxic in vitro to bacterial and to ordinary eukaryotic cells alike. No source on this page identifies a receptor.
- Determined the three-dimensional structure of LL-37 in dodecylphosphocholine micelles by NMR, the peptide having been incorporated into the micelles for the measurement. Under those conditions the peptide adopts a helix-break-helix conformation with both termini unstructured and solvent-exposed; the N-terminal helical region is the more dynamic and the C-terminal helix the more structured and solvent-protected. The break between the helices sits at K12 and is described as probably stabilised by a hydrophobic cluster of I13, F17 and I20 together with a salt bridge between K12 and E16. The peptide is adsorbed on the micelle surface, its hydrophilic face toward the water and its hydrophobic face buried in the micelle. (Porcelli et al., 2008, PMID 18439024)
- Reports that the precursor hCAP-18 showed no detectable cleavage inside cells after phagocytosis, but was cleaved to LL-37 in exocytosed material, and that of the three known serine proteases of azurophil granules, proteinase 3 was solely responsible for that cleavage. The authors describe this as the first detailed account of how this human peptide is generated from its precursor protein. (Sørensen et al., 2001, PMID 11389039)
- Reports that in vitro the peptide is cytotoxic to bacterial and to ordinary eukaryotic cells alike. Polarised attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy found it predominantly α-helical and oriented nearly parallel to the surface of zwitterionic membranes, which the authors state does not support a channel-forming model but rather a detergent-like, carpet-type interaction. (Oren et al., 1999, PMID 10417311)
What has published research on LL-37 found, and what are its limits?
This page records 6 publications, reporting laboratory (in vitro) work in 4, human work in 2. Each is listed with its identifier under References.
Human studies represented: Grönberg et al., 2014, PMID 25041740; Dolkar et al., 2018, PMID 29665030.
Evidence represented on this page: in vitro and human.
No animal research is represented.
The page reviews 6 published studies, and each figure is reported for the study that published it; results are not pooled across studies.
Every human figure on this page was recorded in a controlled study, under supervision, using material prepared for that study, in a population selected by its entry criteria. It is not the research material PepGenex supplies and no result here transfers to it.
Is LL-37 approved by the U.S. FDA?
This page cites no FDA approval record for LL-37; PepGenex Science states a U.S. regulatory status only where a sourced record exists.
PepGenex research materials are not FDA approved and are not for human or veterinary use.
What risks have published studies of LL-37 reported?
2 published human studies on this page report adverse events or safety measurements. Each is listed with its publication in the adverse-events section of this page.
Trial events do not establish a complete safety profile.